Majority
The defendant was not deprived of his right to a public trial (see US Const, 6th Amend; Civil Rights Law § 12; Judiciary Law § 4; People v Jones, 96 NY2d 213 [2001]). Although the defendant initially objected to the exclusion of his girlfriend during an undercover officer’s testimony, defense counsel subsequently withdrew this objection in the defendant’s presence. Accordingly, the defendant waived his right to have his girlfriend present during this portion of the trial (see People v Moody, 300 AD2d 510 [2002]; People v Roque, 291 AD2d 417 [2002]).
The defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143 , 152 [2005]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]; People v Rand, 58 AD3d 758 [2009]). Dillon, J.E, Leventhal, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Dawson 50 NY2d 311 p. 1128
- People v. Bryan 55 AD3d 921 p. 1128
- People v. Casseus 199 AD2d 525 p. 1128
- People v. Reed 83 AD2d 645 p. 1128
- People v. Crimmins 36 NY2d 230 p. 1128
- People v. Archie 200 AD2d 676 p. 1128
- People v. Davis 172 AD2d 553 p. 1128
- People v. Jones 96 NY2d 213 p. 1128
- People v. Moody 300 AD2d 510 p. 1128
- People v. Roque 291 AD2d 417 p. 1128
- People v. Caban 5 NY3d 143 at 152 p. 1128
- People v. Benevento 91 NY2d 708 p. 1128
- People v. Rand 58 AD3d 758 p. 1128