Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta New York Schools Insurance Reciprocal v. Armitage 82 A.D.3d 1628

← Cases

New York Schools Insurance Reciprocal v. Armitage

82 A.D.3d 1628 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2011-03-25 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1628
In the Matter of New York Schools Insurance Reciprocal, Appellant, v Patricia Armitage, Respondent. Alex Celniker et al., Proposed Additional Respondents.
[919 NYS2d 408]

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order denying its petition seeking a permanent stay of arbitration. Respondent sought arbitration following petitioner’s denial of her claim for no-fault insurance benefits. The propriety of the denial of benefits is a “dispute involving the insurer’s liability to pay first party benefits” (Insurance Law § 5106 [b]), and we therefore conclude that Supreme Court properly refused to grant a permanent stay of arbitration (see generally Ryder Truck Lines v Maiorano, 44 NY2d 364 , 368-369 [1978]). Petitioner further contends that the issue whether the offset for workers’ compensation benefits exceeds the monthly limit of first party benefits is not a matter for arbitration. We reject that contention (see Insurance Law § 5102 [a] [2]; see generally § 5106 [b]; Matter of Johnson v Buffalo & Erie County Private Indus. Council, 84 NY2d 13 , 18-19 [1994]; Matter of Cady [Aetna Life & Cas. Co.], 96 AD2d 967 [1983], affd 61 NY2d 594 [1984]).

p. 1629
Finally, we reject petitioner’s contention that, by refusing to grant a permanent stay of arbitration, the court denied petitioner its right to seek a loss-transfer claim from additional proposed respondents (see generally Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. [Hanover Ins. Co.], 307 AD2d 40 , 42-43 [2003]). Present— Scudder, EJ., Fahey, Garni, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Cases cited

Statutes and regulations cited