Majority
CPLR 3216 is an “extremely forgiving” statute (Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 499 , 503 [1997]), which “never requires, but merely authorizes, the Supreme Court to dismiss a plaintiffs action based on the plaintiffs unreasonable neglect to proceed” (Davis v Goodsell, 6 AD3d 382 , 383 [2004]; see Di Simone v Good Samaritan Hosp., 100 NY2d 632 , 633 [2003]; Gibson v Fakheri, 11 AD3d 619 [2010]; Ferrera v Esposit, 66 AD3d 637 , 638 [2009]). Although the statute prohibits the Supreme Court from dismissing a complaint based on failure to prosecute whenever the plaintiff has shown a justifiable excuse for the delay and the existence of a potentially meritorious cause of action, “such a dual showing is not strictly necessary in order for the plaintiff to escape such a dismissal” (Davis v Goodsell, 6 AD3d at 384 ; see Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co., 89 NY2d at 503-504 ; Gibson v Fakheri, 11 AD3d 619 [2010]; Ferrera v Esposit, 66 AD3d at 638 ).
Here, the plaintiff attempted to file her note of issue 11 days beyond the deadline set by the Supreme Court’s certification or
Cases cited
- Baczkowski v. D.A. Collins Construction Co. 89 NY2d 499 at 503 p. 938
- Davis v. Goodsell 6 AD3d 382 at 383 p. 938
- Di Simone v. Good Samaritan Hospital 100 NY2d 632 at 633 p. 938
- In re Elizabeth Susanna R. 11 AD3d 619 p. 938
- Zito v. Jastremski 35 AD3d 458 at 459 p. 939