Majority
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered October 29, 2009, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants’ motions only to the extent of dismissing the complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff commenced this action for personal injuries sustained in an aquatic amusement park in Dubai. The motion court, presuming, without deciding jurisdiction (see Bader & Bader v Ford, 66 AD2d 642 , 647 [1979], lv dismissed 48 NY2d 649 [1979]), providently exercised its discretion in dismissing the action on forum non conveniens grounds (see CPLR 327 [a]). The
In view of the foregoing, we need not consider whether the court should have dismissed the action for lack of personal jurisdiction. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Catterson, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 32514 (U).]
Cases cited
- Islamic Republic of Iran v. Pahlavi 62 NY2d 474 at 481 p. 519
- World Point Trading PTE., Ltd. v. Italiano 225 AD2d 153 at 160-161 p. 519
- Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. v. ICICI Bank Ltd. 9 AD3d 171 at 178 p. 519
- Gillenson v. Happiness Is Camping, Inc. 14 Misc 3d 240 at 244 p. 519