Jackson v. Carter — 86 A.D.3d 540

Majority

p. 540

In the Matter of Erwin Jackson, Petitioner, v Jerald Carter, Respondent.

[926 NYS2d 319]

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564 , 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348 , 352 [1986]). The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Rivera, J.E, Skelos, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cases cited

Holtzman v. Goldman 71 NY2d 564 N.Y. 1988-04-26 at 569 p. 540
Rush v. Mordue 68 NY2d 348 N.Y. 1986-11-18 at 352 p. 540