Majority
Upon a de novo consideration of the People’s appeal, and upon consideration of the arguments presented by assigned appellate counsel, we find that the County Court erred in granting those branches of the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 290.10 which were to set aside the jury verdict convicting him of robbery in the first degree under counts 1, 2, and 3, robbery in the second degree under counts 7, 8, and 9, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree under count 10, and criminal facilitation in the fourth degree under count 12 for the reasons set forth in People v Brun ( 58 AD3d 862 [2009]). Likewise, for the reasons set forth in People v Brun ( 58 AD3d 862 [2009]), we find that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt as an accessory pursuant to count 11 of the indictment, which charged criminal use of a firearm in the first degree under Penal Law § 265.09 (1) (a).
Cases cited
- People v. Brown 45 NY2d 852 at 853-854 p. 550