Majority
As a general rule, we do not consider an issue on a subsequent appeal which was raised or could have been raised in an earlier appeal which was dismissed for lack of prosecution, although the Court has the inherent jurisdiction to do so (see Rubeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 93 NY2d 750 [1999]; Bray v Cox, 38 NY2d 350 [1976]). The plaintiff appealed from a judgment entered January 12, 2009, which upon, inter alia, an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 4, 2005, denying the plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, dismissed the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3404. That appeal was dismissed by decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 4, 2010, for failure to perfect in accordance with the rules of this Court, and that dismissal constituted an
Cases cited
- Rubeo v. National Grange Mutual Insurance 93 NY2d 750 p. 712
- Bray v. Cox 38 NY2d 350 p. 712, p. 713
- Graziano v. Graziano 66 AD3d 835 p. 713
- Blue Chip Mortgage Corp. v. Strumpf 50 AD3d 936 p. 713
- Hepner v. New York City Transit Authority 27 AD3d 418 p. 713