Majority
Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that no nonfrivolous issues exist to be raised on appeal. Defendant submitted a pro se letter to this Court raising several issues and requesting that new counsel be assigned. Upon our review of the record, counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submission, we find that there are issues of arguable merit, including County Court’s discretionary ruling limiting counsel’s cross-examination of the victim (see People v Richardson, 28 AD3d 1002 , 1004 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 817 [2006]; People v Roberts, 12 AD3d 835 , 838 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 802 [2005]), the weight or legal sufficiency of the evidence adduced at trial (see People v Winchester, 14 AD3d 939 , 941 [2005]; People v Porter, 305 AD2d 933 , 933-934 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 586 [2003]) and whether the sentence imposed should be reduced in the interest of justice (see People v Brodus, 307 AD2d 643 , 644 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 618 [2003]; People v Porter, 305 AD2d at 933-934 ). Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of any issue, counsel’s application to be relieved of his assignment is granted and new counsel will be assigned to address these issues and any other issues that the record may disclose (see People v Boodrow, 30 AD3d 680 , 681 [2006]; People v Terry, 28 AD3d 797 , 798 [2006]).
Mercure, J.P, Peters, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.
Cases cited
- People v. Richardson 28 AD3d 1002 at 1004 p. 757
- People v. Roberts 12 AD3d 835 at 838 p. 757
- People v. Winchester 14 AD3d 939 at 941 p. 757
- People v. Porter 305 AD2d 933 at 933-934 p. 757
- People v. Brodus 307 AD2d 643 at 644 p. 757
- People v. Boodrow 30 AD3d 680 at 681 p. 757