Majority
We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report provides substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Dar shan v Bango, 83 AD3d 1302 [2011]; Matter of Johnson v Goord, 42 AD3d 626 , 627 [2007]). Petitioner’s denial of the charges and claim that the misbehavior report was fabricated presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Parra v Fischer, 76 AD3d 724 , 725 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 714 [2010]; Matter of Sital v Fischer, 72 AD3d 1306 , 1307 [2010], lv dismissed 15 NY3d 823 [2010]). Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, we find nothing in the record to indicate that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Abreu v Bezio, 78 AD3d 1341 , 1342 [2010]; Matter of Truman v Fischer, 75 AD3d 1019 , 1020 [2010]), and the disposition included an adequate statement of evidence relied upon (see 7 NYCRR 254.7 [a] [5]). Petitioner’s challenge to the timeliness of the hearing has not been preserved for our review due to his failure to raise it at the hearing (see Matter of Taylor v Fischer, 80 AD3d 1037 , 1037 [2011]; Matter of Rosario v Goord, 25 AD3d 841 , 842 [2006]). Therefore, the determination must be confirmed.
Spain, J.P, Rose, Kavanagh, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Cases cited
- Darshan v. Bango 83 AD3d 1302 p. 779
- Johnson v. Goord 42 AD3d 626 at 627 p. 779
- In re Stuart 15 NY3d 823 p. 779
- Abreu v. Bezio 78 AD3d 1341 at 1342 p. 779
- Truman v. Fischer 75 AD3d 1019 at 1020 p. 779
- Taylor v. Fischer 80 AD3d 1037 at 1037 p. 779
- Rosario v. Goord 25 AD3d 841 at 842 p. 779