People v. Stroud

87 A.D.3d 917 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2011-09-22 English

Contents

Majority

p. 917

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Stroud, Appellant.

[929 NYS2d 736]

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Concur— Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Cases cited

People v. Lingle 16 NY3d 621 N.Y. 2011-04-28 p. 917