← Cases

People v. Burgess

88 A.D.3d 469 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2011-10-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 469
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamel Burgess, Appellant.
[930 NYS2d 442]

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Defendant may not challenge the voluntariness of his underlying guilty plea on this appeal (see People v Jordan, 16 NY3d 845 [2011]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, DeGrasse, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Cases cited