Majority
In this personal injury action, plaintiff Mirjana Lewis alleges that she tripped and fell on a raised corner of a mat located in a vestibule of a D’Agostino’s supermarket. To establish their entitlement to summary judgment, defendants were required to demonstrate as a matter of law that they maintained the subject property in a reasonably safe condition and neither created the alleged dangerous condition nor had actual or constructive notice thereof (see Ross v Betty G. Reader Revocable Trust, 86 AD3d 419 , 421 [2011]).
The record shows that a question of fact exists as to constructive notice due to evidence that D’Agostino was “aware of an
However, summary judgment was properly granted in favor of the owner of the premises, New 56-79 IG Associates, L.B, and its managing agent, BLDG Management Co., Inc. In light of the owner’s status as an out-of-possession landlord, plaintiff was required, but failed, to show “that the purported hazard constituted a structural or design defect that violated a specific statutory provision” (Boateng v Four Plus Corp., 22 AD3d 323 , 324 [2005]).
We find the parties’ remaining arguments unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.E, DeGrasse, Freedman and Román, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 31507 (U).]
Cases cited
- Ross v. Betty G. Reader Revocable Trust 86 AD3d 419 at 421 p. 584
- Simoni v. 2095 Cruger Associates 285 AD2d 431 at 432 p. 585
- Boateng v. Four Plus Corp. 22 AD3d 323 at 324 p. 585