Majority
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report, the hearing testimony, and the documentation presented at the hearing constituted substantial evidence of his guilt (see Matter of Mills v Fischer, 85 AD3d 1033 , 1033 [2011]; Matter of Anekwe v Ercole, 74 AD3d 1335 [2010]; Matter of Lozada v Selsky, 306 AD2d 413 [2003]).
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report contained the necessary specificity to apprise him of the charges against him so as to enable him to prepare an adequate defense (see Matter of Mills v Fischer, 85 AD3d at 1033 ; Matter of Anekwe v Ercole, 74 AD3d 1335 [2010]).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or without merit. Rivera, J.R, Florio, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Mills v. Fischer 85 AD3d 1033 at 1033 p. 728
- Lopez v. Healy 39 AD3d 978 at 978-979 p. 729