Majority
Additionally, because the appellants failed to establish the existence of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct on the part of the plaintiff, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of their separate cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3) to vacate so much of the order dated May 19, 2010, as directed them to produce a certain memorandum (see Citicorp Vendor Fin., Inc. v Island Garden Basketball, Inc., 27 AD3d 608 , 609 [2006]; Aames Capital Corp. v Davidsohn, 24 AD3d 474 , 475 [2005]; Abacus Real Estate Fin. Co. v P.A.R. Constr. & Maintenance Corp., 128 AD2d 821 [1987]). Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 31238 (U).]
Cases cited
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center 64 NY2d 851 at 853 p. 1067
- Wranovics v. Finnerty 277 AD2d 841 at 843 p. 1067
- Hamm v. Slavin 257 AD2d 805 at 806-807 p. 1067
- Vinciguerra v. Northside Partnership 188 AD2d 861 at 862-863 p. 1067
- Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital 68 NY2d 320 at 324 p. 1067
- Citicorp Vendor Finance, Inc. v. Island Garden Basketball, Inc. 27 AD3d 608 at 609 p. 1067
- Aames Capital Corp. v. Davidsohn 24 AD3d 474 at 475 p. 1067