Hyperlawhypertext legal database Thomas v. O'Rourke 89 A.D.3d 1096

← Cases

Thomas v. O'Rourke

89 A.D.3d 1096 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2011-11-29 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1096
In the Matter of Judith Thomas, Petitioner, v Eileen O’Rourke et al., Respondents.
[933 NYS2d 594]
p. 1097
The record contains substantial evidence to support the respondents’ determination terminating the petitioner’s participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (see 24 CFR 982.552 [b] [2] [2010]; Matter of Friend v Mulligan, 16 AD3d 685 , 686 [2005]; Matter of Douglas v Lannert, 272 AD2d 327 [2000]). In addition, the notice of termination adequately apprised the petitioner of the violations upon which the termination of her benefits from the program was based (see Matter of Block v Ambach, 73 NY2d 323 , 333 [1989]; Matter of Friend v Mulligan, 16 AD3d at 686 ).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Dillon, J.P, Angiolillo, Florio and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cases cited