Majority
After petitioner, a prison inmate, forwarded a handwritten document to the law library with the request that it be typed, the document was determined to be a redemption document and petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with unauthorized possession of a Uniform Commercial Code document. He was found guilty of that charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and that determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. Thereafter, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding and Supreme Court dismissed the petition. Petitioner now appeals.
We affirm. To the extent that petitioner challenges the determination based upon substantial evidence, the misbehavior report, copies of the documents and petitioner’s admissions during the hearing provide the quantum of proof necessary to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Bunting v Fischer, 85 AD3d 1473 , 1474 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 712 [2011]; Matter of Samuels v Department of Correctional Servs. Staff, 84 AD3d 1629 , 1630 [2011]). Petitioner’s remaining claims are ei
Mercure, J.E, Rose, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- Bunting v. Fischer 85 AD3d 1473 at 1474 p. 1339
- Samuels v. Department of Correctional Services Staff 84 AD3d 1629 at 1630 p. 1339
- Vidal-Ortiz v. Fischer 84 AD3d 1627 at 1628 p. 1340
- Abreu v. Fischer 83 AD3d 1348 at 1348-1349 p. 1340