Hyperlawhypertext legal database People v. Rawls 89 A.D.3d 605

← Cases

People v. Rawls

89 A.D.3d 605 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2011-11-22 English

Contents

Majority

p. 605
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Rawls, Appellant.
[933 NYS2d 630]

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties; due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Counsel for appellant is referred to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 606.5. Concur— Moskowitz, J.P, Renwick, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.