Majority
In opposition, the insurer failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether it had timely denied the claim. Contrary to the insurer’s contention, its letter to the hospital stating that payment of the claim was delayed “pending adjuster’s review” and “investigation” did not serve to toll the 30-day statutory period (see Westchester Med. Ctr. v Lincoln Gen. Ins. Co., 60 AD3d at 1046 ; Nyack Hosp. v Encompass Ins. Co., 23 AD3d 535 , 536 [2005]).
Failure to establish timely denial of the claim results in preclusion of the defense that the intoxication of the insured was a contributing cause of the accident (see Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y. v Maryland Cas. Co., 90 NY2d 274 , 286 [1997]; Westchester Med. Ctr. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 81 AD3d 929 , 930 [2011]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the hospital’s motion which was for summary judgment on the third cause of action. Rivera, J.E, Skelos, Florio and Austin, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 30730 (U).]
Cases cited
- Westchester Medical Center v. Lincoln General Insurance 60 AD3d 1045 at 1045-1046 p. 703
- Westchester Medical Center v. Progressive Casualty Insurance 51 AD3d 1014 at 1017 p. 703
- New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Selective Insurance 43 AD3d 1019 at 1020 p. 703
- Nyack Hospital v. Encompass Insurance 23 AD3d 535 at 536 p. 703
- Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty Co. 90 NY2d 274 at 286 p. 703
- Westchester Medical Center v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance 81 AD3d 929 at 930 p. 703