Hyperlawhypertext legal database Mulligan v. Rausch 89 A.D.3d 811

← Cases

Mulligan v. Rausch

89 A.D.3d 811 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2011-11-09 English

Contents

Majority

p. 811
Thomas Mulligan, Respondent, v Harry A. Rausch, Jr., et al., Appellants, and Agostino Cervone, M.D., et al., Respondents.
[932 NYS2d 360]
p. 812
The Supreme Court properly determined there were triable issues of fact requiring the denial of the appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. Rivera, J.E, Eng, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.