← Cases

Ames v. Shute

90 A.D.3d 1629 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2011-12-30 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1629
Richard N. Ames, Respondent, v Robert James Shute, Appellant.
[936 NYS2d 586]

On appeal from a judgment of foreclosure and sale, defendant contends for the first time on appeal that, inter alia, the mortgage loan documents should be construed together with a joint venture agreement between plaintiff, defendant and a nonparty. Inasmuch as defendant failed to raise that contention at Supreme Court, it is not properly before us (see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984 , 985 [1994]). In any event, we have considered the merits of defendant’s contentions that are raised for the first time on appeal and conclude that they are without merit. Present — Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Garni, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.