← Cases

People v. Estrella

90 A.D.3d 879 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2011-12-20 English

Contents

Majority

p. 879
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bradley Estrella, Appellant.
[934 NYS2d 718]

The defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive level two risk assessment is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Bowles, 89 AD3d 171 , 180 [2011]; People v Spring, 83 AD3d 1028 [2011]; People v Iorio, 74 AD3d 1306 , 1307 [2010]; People v Williams, 46 AD3d 652 [2007]) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112 ; People v Bowles, 89 AD3d at 180 ; People v Spring, 83 AD3d at 1028 ; People v Iorio, 74 AD3d at 1307 ). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender. Rivera, J.E, Balkin, Eng and Austin, JJ., concur.

Cases cited