Majority
p. 928In the Matter of Phillip Hohn, Respondent, v Nancy Guirand, Appellant. [934 NYS2d 815]
“In analyzing whether nonfrivolous appellate issues exist, it is essential to appreciate the distinction between a potential ap
p. 929
pellate argument that is merely meritless or unlikely to prevail and one that is frivolous” (Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 , 258 [2011]). Here, upon this Court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that a nonfrivolous issue exists as to whether the determination of the Family Court is supported by the weight of the evidence (see Matter of Sblendorio v D'Agostino, 60 AD3d 773 , 774 [2009]; Matter of Hasbrouck v Hasbrouck, 59 AD3d 621 [2009]). Since a review of the record by the Appellate Division cannot substitute for “the single-minded advocacy of appellate counsel,” assignment of new counsel is warranted (People v Casiano, 67 NY2d 906 , 907 [1986]; see Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 , 259 [2011]). Mastro, A.EJ., Angiolillo, Belen and Lott, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- In re Giovanni S. 89 AD3d 252 at 258, at 259 p. 929
- Sblendorio v. D'Agostino 60 AD3d 773 at 774 p. 929
- Hasbrouck v. Hasbrouck 59 AD3d 621 p. 929
- People v. Casiano 67 NY2d 906 at 907 p. 929