Progressive Specialty Insurance v. Alexis — 90 A.D.3d 933

Majority

p. 933

In the Matter of Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, Appellant, v Stephen Alexis et al., Respondents.

[934 NYS2d 719]

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the petition which was to direct disclosure in aid of arbitration pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c), as the petitioner failed to demonstrate that “extraordinary circumstances” existed such that this relief would be absolutely necessary for the protection of its rights (De Sapio v Kohlmeyer, 35 NY2d 402 , 406 [1974] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Morris, 83 AD3d 709 , 710 [2011]; Matter of Travelers

p. 934

Indem. Co. v United Diagnostic Imaging, P.C., 73 AD3d 791 , 791-792 [2010]). Angiolillo, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cases cited

De Sapio v. Kohlmeyer 35 NY2d 402 N.Y. 1974-11-27 at 406 p. 933
Government Employees Insurance v. Morris 83 AD3d 709 N.Y. App. Div. 2011-04-05 at 710 p. 933
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. United Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. 73 AD3d 791 N.Y. App. Div. 2010-05-04 at 791-792 p. 934