Majority
We affirm. “Accidents that occur during an employee’s short breaks, such as coffee breaks, are considered to be so closely related to the performance of the job that they do not constitute an interruption of employment” (Matter of Pabon v New York City Tr. Auth., 24 AD3d 833 [2005] [citations omitted]; accord Matter of Kontogiannis v Nationwide PC, 51 AD3d 1180 , 1181 [2008]). Benefits are awarded “on the theory of constructive control of the employee by the employer during the off-premises activity” (Matter of Balsam v New York State Div. of Empl., 24 AD2d 802 , 803 [1965]; accord Matter of Kouvatsos v Line Masters, 281 AD2d 769 , 770 [2001]). Here, claimant’s supervisor testified that it was customary to allow salespeople to leave the dealership on short paid breaks. Claimant requested permission
Mercure, A.P.J., Rose, Lahtinen and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, with costs to claimant.
Cases cited
- Claim of Kouvatsos v. Line Masters, Inc. 281 AD2d 769 at 770 p. 1016
- Claim of Caporale v. State Department of Taxation & Finance 2 AD2d 91 at 92 p. 1017
- Claim of Caporale v. State Department of Taxation & Finance 2 NY2d 946 p. 1017