Majority
Discovery of medical records regarding a party’s mental or physical condition is permitted when a defendant waives that privilege by affirmatively placing his or her mental or physical condition “in controversy” (CPLR 3121 [a]; see Dillenbeck v Hess, 73 NY2d at 286-287 ; Lombardi v Hall, 5 AD3d 739 , 739-
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not err in finding that the defendant Evan Marshall waived the physician-patient privilege with respect to the medical records and other documents relating to a prior criminal proceeding in which he was a defendant that are the subject of the orders appealed from here (see Webdale v North Gen. Hosp., 7 Misc 3d 947 , 955 [2005], affd 24 AD3d 153 [2005]; see also Szmania v State of New York, 82 AD3d 1688 , 1690 [2011]). Further, under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly, in effect, denied the requests for an in camera review of certain medical records (cf. J.Z. v South Oaks Hosp., 67 AD3d 645 [2009]; Sohan v Long Is. Coll. Hosp., 282 AD2d 597 [2001]). Rivera, J.E, Eng, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Dillenbeck v. Hess 73 NY2d 278 at 284 p. 711
- Lombardi v. Hall 5 AD3d 739 at 739 p. 711
- Koump v. Smith 25 NY2d 287 at 294 p. 712
- Grafi v. Solomon 274 AD2d 451 at 452 p. 712
- Webdale v. North General Hospital 7 Misc 3d 947 at 955 p. 712
- Szmania v. State 82 AD3d 1688 at 1690 p. 712
- J.Z. v. South Oaks Hospital 67 AD3d 645 p. 712