← Cases

People ex rel. Burr v. Rock

93 A.D.3d 977 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2012-03-08 English

Contents

Majority

p. 977
The People of the State of New York ex rel. David A. Burr, Appellant, v David Rock, as Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility, Respondent.
[939 NYS2d 730]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered May 31, 2011 in Franklin County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner is currently serving a prison term of 25 years to life as a result of his conviction of the crimes of murder in the second degree and assault in the second degree. His conviction was affirmed on appeal (People v Burr, 124 AD2d 5 [1987], affd 70 NY2d 354 [1987], cert denied 485 US 989 [1988]). Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 70 proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus claiming that his arrest was unlawful. Supreme Court denied the application without a hearing and petitioner appeals.

We affirm. Habeas corpus relief is not an appropriate remedy for asserting claims that were or could have been raised on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion, even if they are jurisdictional in nature (see People ex rel. Lainfiesta v Lape, 83 AD3d 1303 , 1303 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 708 [2011]; People ex rel. Chapman v LaClair, 64 AD3d 1026 , 1026 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 712 [2009]). CPL 440.10 (1) (a) specifically authorizes a motion to vacate a judgment upon the ground that the court

p. 978
did not have jurisdiction of the defendant (compare People ex rel. Johnson v Fischer, 69 AD3d 1100 , 1101 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 707 [2010]). Accordingly, we find no reason to depart from the traditional orderly procedure (see People ex rel. Purdie v LaValley, 86 AD3d 883 , 884 [2011]; People ex rel. Cisson v Artus, 78 AD3d 1392 , 1393 [2010]).

Peters, J.E, Spain, Stein, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cases cited