Majority
Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), both rendered February 19, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 52/08, and burglary in the second degree (nine counts) under indictment No. 75/08, upon jury verdicts, and imposing sentences.
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). The testimony of the defendant’s
The defendant’s contention that the County Court erred in failing to provide the jury with a charge on accessorial liability is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Brown, 232 AD2d 750 , 752 [1996]; People v Graham, 122 AD2d 162 [1986]) and, in any event, is without merit.
The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P, Hall, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 907
- People v. Romero 7 NY3d 633 p. 907
- People v. Brown 62 AD3d 1089 at 1090-1091 p. 908
- People v. Reome 15 NY3d 188 at 191-192 p. 908
- People v. Breland 83 NY2d 286 at 292-294 p. 908
- People v. Steinberg 79 NY2d 673 at 683 p. 908
- People v. Morales 86 AD3d 147 at 162 p. 908
- People v. Delgado 50 AD3d 915 at 917 p. 908
- People v. Montefusco 44 AD3d 879 at 880 p. 908
- People v. Brown 232 AD2d 750 at 752 p. 908
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 908