Majority
— Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence is granted, and a new trial is ordered.
For the reasons stated in our decision on the codefendant’s appeal (see People v Vargas, 89 AD3d 771 [2011]), that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence should have been granted. Contrary to the People’s contention, the error in admitting the physical evidence was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 , 237 [1975]). Rivera, J.P., Hall, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Vargas 89 AD3d 771 p. 873
- People v. Crimmins 36 NY2d 230 at 237 p. 873