← Cases

Robinson v. Peck

97 A.D.3d 685 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2012-07-11 English

Contents

Majority

p. 685
In the Matter of Steven Robinson, Petitioner, v George R. Peck, Respondent.
[947 NYS2d 891]
p. 686
“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564 , 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348 , 352 [1986]).

The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Angiolillo, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Cases cited