Majority
p. 1246Karen Casale, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Stephanie Casale, an Infant, Respondent, v Liverpool Central School District, Appellant. [951 NYS2d 439]
Memorandum: Contrary to respondent’s contention, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting claimant’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5). Although a court may properly consider whether a claimant provided a reasonable excuse for failing to serve a timely notice of claim (see Parton v Onondaga County, 81 AD3d 1433 , 1433-1434 [2011]), a claimant’s failure to tender a reasonable excuse “is not fatal where . . . actual notice was had and there is no compelling showing of prejudice to [respondent]” (Matter of Hall v Madison-Oneida County Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs., 66 AD3d 1434 , 1435 [2009] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Hale
p. 1247
v Webster Cent. School Dist., 12 AD3d 1052 , 1053 [2004]). Here, claimant “made a persuasive showing that [respondent] ‘acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim’ . . . [and respondent has] made no particularized or persuasive showing that the delay caused [it] substantial prejudice” (Wetzel Servs. Corp. v Town of Amherst, 207 AD2d 965 , 965 [1994]; see § 50-e [5]). Present — Fahey, J.E, Peradotto, Garni and Sconiers, JJ.
Cases cited
- Parton v. Onondaga County 81 AD3d 1433 at 1433-1434 p. 1246
- Hall v. Madison-Oneida County Board of Cooperative Educational Services 66 AD3d 1434 at 1435 p. 1246
- Hale v. Webster Central School District 12 AD3d 1052 at 1053 p. 1247