Majority
The security reports of criminal activity in the building complex over the three years prior to the attack raise at least a triable issue as to the foreseeability of the attack against plaintiff (see Romero v Twin Parks Southeast Houses, Inc., 70 AD3d 484 , 485 [1st Dept 2010]; Baez v 2347 Morris Realty, Inc., 69 AD3d 480 [1st Dept 2010]; Rios v Jackson Assoc., 259 AD2d 608 , 609-610 [2d Dept 1999]). Additional evidence presents triable issues as to whether it was more likely than not that the assailants were intruders who gained access to the premises through the allegedly negligently maintained entrance (see Chunn v New York City Hous. Auth., 83 AD3d 416 , 417 [1st Dept 2011]; Calderin v Lyra Assoc., 281 AD2d 248 [1st Dept 2001]).
Moreover, the criminal assault was not so extraordinary and unforeseeable as to break the causal connection between plaintiffs injuries and defendant’s conduct as a matter of law (see Newman v McDonald’s Rests. of N.Y., Inc., 48 AD3d 1152 , 1153 [4th Dept 2008]). The record does not include evidence of a criminal conspiracy to assault plaintiff that is sufficient to support the conclusion that it is most unlikely that reasonable security measures, such as a functioning magnetic door lock, would have deterred the criminal participants. Concur— Andrias, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Cases cited
- Comfort Manu Anokye v. 240 East 175th Street Housing Development Fund Corp. 16 AD3d 287 p. 456
- Romero v. Twin Parks Southeast Houses, Inc. 70 AD3d 484 at 485 p. 456
- Chunn v. New York City Housing Authority 83 AD3d 416 at 417 p. 456
- Calderin v. Lyra Associates, L. L. C. 281 AD2d 248 p. 456
- Newman v. McDonald's Restaurants of New York, Inc. 48 AD3d 1152 at 1153 p. 456