Majority
The referee’s determination that petitioner failed to establish the existence of extraordinary circumstances warranting a change of custody has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Tristram K., 25 AD3d 222 , 226 [1st Dept 2005]). Petitioner’s concerns related to matters that occurred
Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the court did not err by sustaining a hearsay objection to her testimony regarding the child’s out-of-court statements. The record is devoid of any offer of proof as to how the child’s statements would be corroborated (see Matter of Peter G., 6 AD3d 201 [1st Dept 2004], appeal dismissed 3 NY3d 655 [2004]). Concur — Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Cases cited
- In re Tristram K. 25 AD3d 222 at 226 p. 537
- In re Peter G. 6 AD3d 201 p. 538
- People v. Valencia 3 NY3d 655 p. 538