Majority
Headnote
Where a servant of a telegraph company, in consequence of a defect in a telegraph pole, is injured by a fall therefrom while engaged in the duties of his employment, upon the pole, the company is liable for damages, upon a complaint alleging negligence and unskillfulness in the defendants in providing and using an insufficient and unsound pole, and in not having and using pike-poles and other guards and securities; although knowledge in the company, of the defect in the pole, is not expressly alleged.In Keegan v. The Western Rail Road Company, (4 Seld. 175,) the complaint is very similar to this, and 'judgment for the plaintiff was affirmed. Admitted knowledge in the defendants, of the defect in the engine, was not expressly stated there, but proof of such knowledge was received, under a complaint alleging negligence in the defendants. If that complaint had been defective, judgment upon it should not have been affirmed. It is true,
[New York General Term,
November 2, 1857,
In this case the allegation of negligence would be sustained by proving the danger from the defect in the pole, in this case, and that it was known to the defendants. For this reason, the demurrer should be overruled, with leave to the defendants to amend, on payment of costs of the demurrer.
Order affirmed.
Mitchell, Roosevelt and Peabody, Justices.]