Hyperlawhypertext legal database Bach v. Coles 3 Cai. 83

← Cases

Bach v. Coles

3 Cai. 83 Court N.Y. Sup. Ct. English

Contents

Majority

p. 83
Bach and Bach against Coles.
NEW-YORK
May, 1805.

Headnote

The court will not hear an applicalion for an order to stay proceedings on a case made, unless recourse has previously, and without success been had to a judge.

THIS was an application to the court, in the first instance for an order to stay proceedings ol a case made.

Though the rule authorizing parties to apply to a judge for this purpose, does not abrogate the power of the court, yet we ought never to be resorte^to, till the other mode has been attempted, This is chamber business.