Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. Woodbury 10 Cal. 187

← Cases

Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. Woodbury

10 Cal. 187 Court Cal. English

Delivered by Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Contents

Majority

p. 187
MOKELUMNE HILL CANAL AND MINING COMPANY v. WOODBURY.

Headnote

This Court will not look through a voluminous record for errors of the Court below, where none are assigned by counsel, and where there is no abstract of facts on file.
Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, County of Calaveras.
Shafter, Park & Heydenfeldt, for Appellant.
p. 188
Robinson & Beatty for Respondents.

Terry, C. J., and Field, J., concurring.

This is an appeal from an order of the Court helow, dissolving an injunction. The record contains a mass of affidavits, and other matter, making a transcript of near one hundred pages. There is no brief, and no abstract of facts on file, and it is only-alleged, in general terms, that the Court erred in dissolving the injunction. We can not look through this large record for errors, when none have been stated by counsel.

The order of the District Court is, therefore, affirmed.