Partridge v. McKinney — 13 Cal. 158

Majority

p. 158

PARTRIDGE v. McKINNEY et als.

Headnote

The question as to the necessity of recording mining claims reserved.

Appeal from the Ninth District.

This case is reported in 12 Cal.

Terry, C. J. concurring:

In this ease a rehearing was granted.' An opinion was rendered by Mr. Justice Burnett, and concurred in. We think, on a re-examination, that this opinion is correct on the proposition before the Court; but that it is not necessary to express any opinion as to the necessity of recording mining claims. That question is reserved. With this qualification, we adopt that opinion, and the result of it, as the judgment of the Court.

Ordered accordingly.