Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Moore v. Roff 13 Cal. 489

← Cases

Moore v. Roff

13 Cal. 489 Court Cal. English

Contents

Majority

p. 489
MOORE et al. v. ROFF et al.

Headnote

Moore v. Wilkinson, (supra,) affirmed.

The facts of this case are similar to the facts in Moore et al. v. Wilkinson et al. with the exception that the defendants have never filed any declaratory statement of their intention to preempt the quarter sections which they occupy. The case, if possible, is more barren of merit than the one cited, and on that authority the judgment is affirmed.