Majority
p. 624[L. A. No. 2433. In Bank. April 15, 1910.] E. L. DOHENY, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent. E. L. DOHENY, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent. [L. A. No. 2434.
Headnote
'Taxation—Shares of Stock in Domestic Corporation—Property Out op State—Cash Value of Shares Assessable.—For the reasons assigned in Cornfield v. County of Los Angeles,- (L. A. No. 2432,) ante, p. 617, holding that shares of stock in a domestic corporation whose property is situated outside of the state may be assessed at their cash value, without deduction on aeeount of such property, the judgments and orders from which the appeals in the foregoing cases were taken are affirmed.APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from orders denying new trials to the -appellant. Walter Bordwell, Judge.
p. 625
The facts ■ are the same as those stated in the opinion of the court in L. A. No. 2432, ante, p. 617.
Ward Chapman, for Appellant.
J. D. Fredericks, District Attorney, and Hartley Shaw, Chief Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.
For the reasons expressed in the opinion of this court in Canfield v. County of Los Angeles, ante, p. 617, [ 108 Pac. 705 ], the judgments and orders from which appeals are taken are affirmed.