Majority
p. 761[L. A. No. 3029. Department Two. March 2, 1912.] SARAH J. TEDFORD, Appellant, v. LESLIE F. GAY et al., Respondents.
Headnote
Judgment and order affirmed on the authority of Bedford v. Eichler, ante, p. 214, [ 121 Pac. 730 ].
p. 762
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. W. R„ Hervey, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Ted-ford v. Bidder, cunte, p. 214, [ 121 Pac. 730 ].
G. L. Whitham, for Appellant.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Hammack & Hammack, E. T. Sherer, and Joseph Smith, for Respondents.
The above entitled cause presents the same propositions considered in Tedford v. Eichler (L. A. No. 2772), ante, p. 214, [ 121 Pac. 730 ], and was submitted with the last mentioned case for decision. For the reasons there given the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
Hearing in Bank denied.