← Cases

Eichler v. Tedford

162 Cal. 762 Court Department Two. Decision date 1912-03-02 Docket L. A. No. 3009 English

Contents

Majority

p. 762
[L. A. No. 3009.
Department Two.
March 2, 1912.]
MAIME L. EICHLER, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of the Estate of Emily J. Tedford, Deceased, Respondent, v. SARAH J. TEDFORD, as Executrix of the Estate of Asa C. Tedford, Deceased, Appellant.

Headnote

Order affirmed on authority of Tedford, v. Michler, ante, p. 214, [ 121 Pac. 730 ].
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing a new trial. Walter Bordwell, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Ted-ford v. Bidder, ante, p. 214, [ 121 Pac. 730 ].
Will D. Gould, and G. L. Whitham, for Appellant.
D. C. Surrey, and Harris & Swanwick, for Respondent.

The above entitled cause presents the same propositions considered in Tedford v. Eichler, (L. A. No. 2772), ante, p. 214, [ 121 Pac. 730 ], and was submitted with the last mentioned case for decision. For the reasons there given the order appealed from is affirmed.

Hearing, in Bank denied.