← Cases

People v. Eilersficken

172 Cal. 815 Court Cal. Decision date 1916-03-24 Docket Crim. No. 1976 English

Delivered by MELVIN, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 815
[Crim. No. 1976.
In Bank.
March 24, 1916.]
THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. FREDERICK R. C. EILERSFICKEN, Appellant.

Headnote

Medical Practice Act.—Judgment' and order affirmed on the authority of People v. Jordan, ante, p. 391.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order refusing a new trial. T. L. Lewis, Judge.
p. 816
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in People v. Jordan, ante, p. 391.
D. F. Gladden, and A. T. French, for Appellant.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, Robert M. Clarke, Deputy Attorney-General, and D. V. Mahoney, District Attorney, for Respondent.

The questions involved in the appeals herein from the judgment and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial are the same as those which arose in the appeals in People v. Jordan, Crim. 1973 (opinion filed March 24,1916), ante, p. 391, and upon the authority of that case the judgment and order are affirmed.

Henshaw, J., Sloss, J., Shaw, J., Lawlor, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.