Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Bank of California v. Richardson 175 Cal. 813

← Cases

Bank of California v. Richardson

175 Cal. 813 Court Cal. Decision date 1917-06-18 Docket S. F. No. 8381 English

Contents

Majority

p. 813
[S. F. No. 8381.
In Bank.
June 18, 1917.]
THE BANK OF CALIFORNIA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (a Corporation), Appellant, v. FRIEND WM. RICHARDSON, as Treasurer, etc., Respondent.

Headnote

Taxation—Bank Stock—Constitutional Law.—Judgment affirmed on the authority of Bank of California v. Bokerts, 173 Cal. 398 .
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion of the court in Bank of California v. Roberts, 173 Cal. 398 , [ 160 Pac. 255 ],
Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, for Appellant.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Raymond Benjamin, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

It is stipulated in this case that all of the questions involved in the appeal are identical with those involved and passed upon by this court in the case of the Bank of California v. Roberts, as Treasurer, reported in 173 Cal., commencing at page 398, [ 160 Pac. 255 ]. On the authority of that case, the judgment must be affirmed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cases cited