Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Sonoma Magnesite Co. v. National Magnesite Products Corp. 189 Cal. 433

← Cases

Sonoma Magnesite Co. v. National Magnesite Products Corp.

189 Cal. 433 Court Cal. Decision date 1922-08-15 Docket S. F. No. 10261 English

Delivered by SHAW, C. J.

Contents

Majority

p. 433
[S. F. No. 10261.
In Bank
August 15, 1922.]
SONOMA MAGNESITE COMPANY, Appellant, v. NATIONAL MAGNESITE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Respondent.

Headnote

[1] Appeal—Lack op Merit—Dismissal.—An appeal will be dismissed where it clearly appears from the transcript that the appellant has no cause of appeal, that it is taken from the judgment upon the judgment-roll alone and that the judgment is in full accord with the findings.
MOTION to dismiss an appeal.
"Granted.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Erwin L." Chloupek and George E. Crothers for Appellant.
J. R. Leppo and Sterling Carr for Respondent.

Defendant moves this court to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the judgment was entered by consent of the parties, that the sale was made by the consent of the parties, and upon the further ground that the agreement of January 17, 1922, between Chloupek, as at

p. 434
torney for plaintiff, and the National Magnesite Products Corporation, estops plaintiff from appealing from the judgment herein.

[1] Since notice of the motion. was filed, the appellant and the respondent have each filed additional papers and, among other things, the transcript on appeal has been filed, wherefrom it clearly appears that the plaintiff has no cause of appeal whatever, that it has appealed from the judgment upon the judgment-roll alone and that the judgment is in full accord with the findings. Wherefore no cause whatever appears whereby said appeal can be sustained. It is considered that the appeal should be dismissed without regard to the sufficiency of the causes set forth in the motion.

Let the dismissal be made without costs to either party.

Waste, J., Sloane, J., and Lennon, J., concurred.