Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Browning v. Reclamation District No. 108 200 Cal. 800

← Cases

Browning v. Reclamation District No. 108

200 Cal. 800 Court Cal. Decision date 1927-02-28 Docket Sac. No. 3868 English

Contents

Majority

p. 800
[Sac. No. 3868.
In Bank.
February 28, 1927.]
J. W. BROWNING et al., Appellants, v. RECLAMATION DISTRICT No. 108, Respondent.

Headnote

El] Reclamation Districts—Reclamation and Irrigation—Validity of Assessment.—The judgment in this case is affirmed, upon the authority of Hershey et al. v. Reclamation District No. 108 et al., ante, p. 550.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County. George H. Thompson, Judge Presiding.
Affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Seth Millington for Appellant.
Thos. Rutledge and Devlin & Devlin for Respondent.

[1] Upon the grounds stated, and for the reasons set forth in Hershey et al. v. Reclamation District No. 108 et al., ante, p. 550 [ 254 Pac. 542 ], and in Browning v. Reclamation District No. 108, ante, p. 799 [ 254 Pac. 551 ], the judgment appealed from is affirmed.