Majority
p. 767[L. A. No. 8516. In Bank. April 6, 1927.] GOLDEN STATE BANK (a Corporation), Respondent, v. BLANCHE L. DOLPH, Appellant.
Headnote
[1] Promissory Notes — Negotiability — Time or Payment. — The judgment in this case is affirmed on the authority of The Anaheim, National Bank v. Dolph, ante, p. 17.APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. R. T. Williams, Judge.
Affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Black, Hammack & Black and Meserve & Meserve for Appellant.
Underwood, Burke & Cree for Respondent.
[1] This is an appeal on the judgmentroll from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff on a promissory note. The facts are the same as those involved in The Anaheim National Bank v. Dolph, ante, p. 17 [ 255 Pac. 184 ], with the exception of the amount of the note. By stipulation this appeal was submitted for decision on the arguments and briefs in that case. On the authority of said ease, the judgment is affirmed.