Majority
p. 702[Sac. No. 3995. Department One. July 11, 1928.] LIZZIE H. GLIDE, Appellant, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO (a Municipal Corporation), Respondent.
Huston, Huston & Huston, for Appellant.
R. L. Shinn for Respondent.
The order granting defendant's motion for a change of venue in this action is affirmed on the authority of Finance & Construction Co. of California v. City of Sacramento, ante, p. 491 [ 269 Pac. 167 ]. The only difference in the two cases is that in this case the plaintiff is a private person, while in case No. 3996 the plaintiff is a corporation. This difference is not material to any question involved herein.
Hearing in Bank denied.
All the Justices present concurred.