Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Miller v. Mun. Court of L.A. 209 Cal. 777

← Cases

Miller v. Mun. Court of L.A.

209 Cal. 777 Court Cal. Decision date 1930-02-21 Docket L. A. No. 11926 English

Contents

Majority

p. 777
[L. A. No. 11926.
In Bank.
February 21, 1930.]
MARJORIE MILLER, Petitioner, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, etc., et al., Respondents.
Gerald R. Edgington and Lewis A. Schaffer for Petitioner.
Lloyd S. Nix, City Prosecutor, and Joe W. Matherly and F. W. Fellows, Deputies City Prosecutor, for Respondents.

— Upon the authority of Hansen v. Municipal Court, 208 Cal. 506 [ 282 Pac. 384 ], and Keaton v. Municipal Court (L. A. No. 11849), ante, p. 52 [ 285 Pac. 696 ], this day decided, we are of the opinion that the peremptory writ of mandate should be issued as prayed for, and it is so ordered.

Cases cited