Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Howe v. Mun. Court of L.A. 209 Cal. 778

← Cases

Howe v. Mun. Court of L.A.

209 Cal. 778 Court Cal. Decision date 1930-02-21 Docket L. A. No. 11927 English

Contents

Majority

p. 778
[L. A. No. 11927.
In Bank.
February 21,1930.]
GERTRUDE HOWE, Petitioner, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, etc., et al„ Respondents.
Max Lewis and Gerald R. Edgington for Petitioner.
Lloyd S. Nix, City Prosecutor, and Joe W. Matherly and F. W. Fellows, Deputies City Prosecutor, for Respondents.

— Upon the authority of Hansen v. Municipal Court, 208 Cal. 506 [ 282 Pac. 384 ], and Keaton v. Municipal Court (L. A. No. 11849), ante, p. 52 [ 285 Pac. 696 ], this day decided, we are of the opinion that the peremptory writ of mandate should be issued as prayed for, and it is so ordered.

Cases cited