Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Schwartz v. Mun. Court of L.A. 209 Cal. 779

← Cases

Schwartz v. Mun. Court of L.A.

209 Cal. 779 Court Cal. Decision date 1930-02-21 Docket S. F. No. 13706 English

Contents

Majority

p. 779
[S. F. No. 13706.
In Bank.
February 21, 1930.]
NATHAN SCHWARTZ, Petitioner, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, etc., et al., Respondents.
p. 780
Henry Haves and W. L. Engelhardt for Petitioner.
Lloyd S. Nix, City Prosecutor, and Joe W. Matherly and F. W. Fellows, Deputies City Prosecutor, for Respondents.

— Upon the authority of Hansen v. Municipal Court, 208 Cal. 506 [ 282 Pac. 384 ], and Keaton v. Municipal Court (L. A. No. 11849), ante, p. 52 [ 285 Pac. 696 ], this day decided, we are of the opinion that the peremptory writ, of mandate should be issued as prayed for, and it is so ordered.

Cases cited