← Cases

Rutherford v. City of Los Angeles

211 Cal. 777 Court Cal. Decision date 1930-12-31 Docket L. A. No. 10657 English

Contents

Majority

p. 777
[L. A. No. 10657.
In Bank.
December 31, 1930.]
RUTH EUNA RUTHERFORD et al. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation) et al., Respondents.
Roy A. Linn, Woodruff, Musick & Hartke, Walter W. Rennie and Harmel L. Pratt for Appellants.
Erwin P. Werner, City Attorney, and Frederick von Schrader, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents.

The facts and problems involved in this* case are set forth in the opinion in the case of Jones v. City of Los Angeles (L. A. No. 10654), ante, p. 304 [ 295 Pac. 14 ], this day filed. On the authority of that case the judgment is reversed.

Rehearing denied.

Seawell, J., Curtis, J., and Shenk, J., dissented.